Browsing articles tagged with "New York Times - Marketing Your Business with Mobile"

Google: Here's How Well Mobile Ads Can Work

Oct 17, 2012   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

The big rap on mobile advertising from marketers is that all they get is a tiny piece of a tiny screen to tell their stories–nothing like TV spots, print ads, or even Web banner ads. That's one reason spending on mobile ads remains so small that it's worrying investors in every online company from Google to Facebook to the New York Times, all of whose audiences are using their services more and …

Google: Here's How Well Mobile Ads Can Really Work

Oct 9, 2012   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

The big rap on mobile advertising from marketers is that all they get is a tiny piece of a tiny screen to tell their stories–nothing like TV spots, print ads, or even Web banner ads. That's one reason spending on mobile ads remains so small that it's worrying investors in every online company from Google to Facebook to the New York Times, all of whose audiences are using their services more and …

3 Things You Should Know About Small Business: June 12

Jun 12, 2012   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — What's happening in small business today? 1. Mompreneurs are succeeding in the tech industry. There is much to be said for women who have figured out how to have children and a successful career at the same time. There is even more to be said for the women behind high-growth tech companies with children, as in a recent New York Times profile of women breaking through the …

The long haul

Apr 12, 2012   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

By Raman Chadha

From a recent piece in the New York Times, in response to the recent Goldman Sachs episode:

Wall Street, of course, has always sought profits — but if greed were to be countenanced, it should be long-term greed, not short-term greed, in the words of Gus Levy, who led Goldman Sachs in the 1960s and ’70s. With long-term greed, money was made with clients, not from them.

Nostalgic as it might seem, seasoned players at Goldman and other top-tier firms insist that there was a time when long-term greed was the order of the day, at least publicly and often privately, too. But over the last 25 years, as the incentive structure metamorphosed, longtime bankers and scholars say, Wall Street has been remade in ways that Mr. Levy would hardly recognize.

With the rapid growth of proprietary trading beginning in the 1980s, as firms used their own capital to make bets, a short-term mentality came to dominate firms, according to Mr. Elson. “You make a much bigger buck on a transaction than on the long-term relationship,” he said. “You have profiteers as opposed to advisers.”

When I read this article, it was the proverbial icing on my cake, in a high-profile and broad-reaching way.

You see, over the past year-and-a-half, I’ve increasingly observed and experienced a pattern of transaction trumping relationship, cost-cutting trumping investment and outcome trumping process. Some of that has been personal, but much of it has been environmental, as seen in the Goldman Sachs case.

It all has me wondering, whatever happened to the long haul? What happened to planning for, and thinking about, the future? How come we rarely hear about predictions, forecasts and prognostications beyond one year out? Why don’t we romanticize technologies of the future, like we once did with robots and flying cars? Is it because we ignorantly believe that the future is here? Or is it because we’re just so content with iPhones and the internet?

What I’ve found equally worrisome is the increasingly short-term view in the world of startups and entrepreneurship. Having been in that world for over 16 years, it’s a trend I noticed over the last three to four years (save for the dot-com boom). Some people have said it’s another sign that we’re living in a bubble. But for me, it’s more than just financial; it almost feels like a cultural shift, manifested in the expectations we now have.

These days, we get giddy about startups that form over a weekend but don’t bother following up to see what happens to those ventures. We celebrate wildly when companies go public in a few years and then beat them up for drops in stock price weeks after the IPO. And startups that get into highly competitive accelerators? After fawning over them for three months, we’re disappointed when they can’t raise a boatload of capital or get covered by TechCrunch. And, of course, it doesn’t help when companies go from “0-60 in four seconds” (although the lesson there is to simply never, never, never give up).

So let me address both my worries about the long haul in one fell swoop: I predict things are going to change.

I believe we’re going to start investing in people rather than companies. People build things, create value, and make progress. Companies come and go. When they fail, people bounce back but companies vaporize. When they succeed, people push themselves to greater heights but companies trip over themselves trying to replicate their success.

I believe founders will increasingly put their foot down and insist that they know what’s best for their startups, not investors, bloggers, or self-proclaimed experts. After all, it’s their baby; anyone who’s a parent knows what I’m talking about.

I believe we’re going to value learning over metrics. Learning has a compounding effect; it builds upon itself so that over time, one gains wisdom. Metrics change with the wind and are a snapshot view at a single moment in time. In and of themselves, they have zero value.

Speaking of learning and metrics, I believe we’re going to evaluate entrepreneurs differently. Rather than where they went to school or how much passion they have, we’re going to look at what they’ve built, if they’ve failed, and whether they have the moxie to be a strong leader.

Finally, I believe we’re going to get more connected in real life, not less. Interaction by text and Facebook is most productive as an outcome of relationships, which are an outcome of face-to-face interaction. Deals get done in person, not virtually. The trend toward telecommuting is already shifting toward co-working. The word “meetup” has become part of our vernacular.

So there you have it . . . my predictions about the future are really about a shift back to the long haul: making investments today in order to build value over time. Sure, I may be naive and idealistic, but isn’t that what people said when JFK predicted we’d go to the moon?

Raman Chadha is an entrepreneurship expert and educator, having consulted, taught, and mentored hundreds of startups over 16 years. Most recently, he left the Coleman Entrepreneurship Center at DePaul University to co-found a new incubator, venture fund, and co-working space. At DePaul, Raman remains a Clinical Professor, teaching New Venture Lab, Entrepreneurship Strategy, and Corporate Entrepreneurship. He also runs an entrepreneurship club at his children’s school, and is a regular speaker and writer on the topic.

Check out his blog here. And follow him on Twitter: @RamanChadha.

Planning your small business or personal finance for 2012

Jan 14, 2012   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

You don’t have to break the bank to see how your spending your money. You just need the right tools. This happens to be one of them. And as always we look for the best value too. FREE is always good, and no I don’t mean Free to start, I mean FREE forever.

Get to plug in your business and track away!!! Click on the LINK BELOW AND DO IT NOW. Just let the ad load and then check out the site.

Small business owners need all the help they can get. This is a great FREE site to help you manage your personal/business finance. Top Pic by Money Magazine, New York Times, and ABC News. Very cool…. Owned by intuit the same makers of QuickBooks. Have been using it for over a year now! Check it out HERE! http://adf.ly/4hgZG No Obligation, just a great resources.

New York Times accidentally sends email to millions

Dec 29, 2011   //   by jswima1   //   Blog  //  No Comments

About 8 million people received an email sent by mistake from the New York Times.

Featured Resources

Follow Us On Facebook